Platform

The Intelligence Layer Behind the Conversation

ANDIP LIVE is a proposed provider-neutral intelligence layer for voice AI: coordinating evidence, policy, specialist work, and incremental recommendations while the primary voice agent keeps the conversation moving.

01 — Product vision

Support the voice provider; strengthen the decision

ANDIP LIVE does not replace voice providers. It is designed to make their conversational agents more informed without taking ownership of the primary call.

Voice provider

The conversation remains here

Listening, speaking, turn-taking, and the primary relationship

  1. Receive audio and understand the caller's request
  2. Manage turn-taking, clarification, tone, and response delivery
  3. Decide how to communicate an answer in the live conversation
ANDIP LIVE

Structured intelligence works behind it

Research, verification, policy-aware recommendations, and operational signals

  1. Accept a bounded request with context, deadline, permissions, and budget
  2. Coordinate specialist agents and external lookups under that request
  3. Return qualified evidence and recommendations incrementally
Architectural boundary

The provider remains responsible for the customer-facing voice experience. ANDIP LIVE is a proposed supporting layer, not a new voice, speech, or turn-taking provider.

02 — Capability map

Nine proposed capabilities for time-bounded intelligence

These capabilities describe the intended platform surface. Each remains proposed or under development.

Proposed

Primary Voice Agent Integration

Provide a structured handoff between a voice agent and supporting intelligence without moving the call itself.

Proposed

Live Decision Broker

Classify requests, set bounds, prioritize work, and assemble useful results against a live deadline.

Under development

Specialist Agent Coordination

Route bounded subtasks to research, operations, policy, and other specialist workers.

Proposed

Evidence Verification

Attach source references, timestamps, and evidence-quality signals before a recommendation is returned.

Proposed

Business Policy Evaluation

Evaluate proposed actions against supplied eligibility, authority, and business-rule constraints.

Under development

Background Knowledge Preparation

Prepare approved, time-stamped context before calls so predictable questions need less live work.

Proposed

Incremental Intelligence Delivery

Return a first useful signal and subsequent evidence rather than waiting for every task to finish.

Under development

ANDIP Distributed Execution

Use the parent platform's available execution resources while preserving task and worker boundaries.

Proposed

Monitoring and Cost Visibility

Expose operational status, resource consumption, latency signals, and cost estimates for review.

03 — Platform composition

How the components work together

A conceptual stack separates the live voice path from intelligence coordination and distributed execution.

Capability stack and integration surfaces

Conceptual

ANDIP LIVE capability stack with voice, intelligence, execution, and integration surfaces Three horizontal bands show the voice path on top, intelligence path in the middle, and execution path below. A right-hand column lists integration surfaces for the voice provider, business systems, evidence sources, and ANDIP infrastructure. VOICE PATHListen · speak · turn-takingPrimary conversation VOICE PROVIDER INTERFACEStructured request in · recommendation and status out INTELLIGENCE PATHBroker · evidence · policyIncremental updates ALI — ANDIP LIVE INTELLIGENCEClassify · coordinate · verify · recommend EXECUTION PATHWorkers · tools · task stateResource controls ANDIP DISTRIBUTED EXECUTIONParallel supporting agents and bounded tasks VOICE SURFACEProvider sessionEvents and updates BUSINESS SURFACEPolicies and systemsEvidence sources ANDIP SURFACEWorkers and resourcesTasks and monitoring
Live communicationInfrastructure and brokerDecision and execution boundary

Conceptual architecture. Integration surfaces and execution behaviour remain subject to engineering validation.

04 — Delivery contract

A bounded request in; qualified progress out

The proposed contract makes the live deadline and operating constraints explicit before supporting work begins.

  • Request intakeQuestion, conversation context, deadline, permissions, and budget are supplied by the calling system.
  • Plan and prioritizeThe broker chooses bounded work, avoids unnecessary agent creation, and records the active task state.
  • Incremental deliveryStatus updates and first useful evidence can arrive before every background task completes.
  • Qualified recommendationResults carry timestamps, source references, confidence or evidence-quality signals, and operational status.
Illustrative request/response shape — not a published API
{
  "request": {
    "question": "Can this offer be extended?",
    "context": "conversation-scoped facts",
    "deadline": "live-request boundary",
    "permissions": ["read:policy"],
    "budget": "bounded"
  },
  "updates": [
    {"status": "working", "timestamp": "..."},
    {"evidence": [], "confidence": "qualified"},
    {"operational_status": "complete"}
  ]
}

Conceptual delivery sequence

Not a published API

Conceptual delivery sequence from request intake to qualified update Four connected boxes show a request entering with context and constraints, bounded work being planned, incremental evidence becoming available, and a qualified recommendation returning with operational metadata. REQUEST INQuestion · contextDeadline · permissions PLANPrioritize · boundRoute necessary work PROGRESSEvidence · statusTimestamps · sources UPDATE OUTConfidence · qualityOperational status Useful results may arrive incrementally; failure states remain explicit.

Illustrative sequence only. The shape describes a design contract, not a released endpoint.

05 — Operating priorities

Controls for live work and accountable execution

These are platform priorities and design guarantees to validate during engineering, not claims about released performance.

  1. Live work first. A request attached to an active conversation is prioritised over background preparation when resources compete.
  2. Strict deadlines. Supporting tasks operate against an explicit time boundary and can return a qualified partial result.
  3. Only necessary agents. The broker should create or route work only when the request justifies it.
  4. Conversation isolation. Context is scoped per conversation so one caller's information is not silently reused for another.
  5. Defined failure fallback. A failed task reports its status and limitation, allowing the voice agent to explain uncertainty or continue with a safer response.
  6. Visible operations. Cost, latency, resource consumption, and task status are intended to remain inspectable.
06 — Platform questions

Honest answers for an early platform

ANDIP LIVE is in Architecture and Early Engineering. The answers below separate direction from release status.

Trace the proposal from architecture to participation

Read the system view, inspect the broker concept, review the documentation direction, or follow the community alpha path.