Development Path

A Measurable Path to Community Alpha and Launch

ANDIP LIVE is moving from architecture and early engineering toward a narrow, reproducible community alpha, with each stage gated by evidence rather than optimism.

01 — Roadmap Overview

Progress is measured by what can be reproduced

The sequence below describes the intended development path. It is a planning view of work under development, not a claim that any gate has already been completed.

Development gates

Conceptual timeline · planning view

ANDIP LIVE development roadmap with five milestone gates A horizontal track connects five milestones: NOW for architecture and integration contracts, BUILD for broker and parallel execution, Q1 2027 for community alpha, VALIDATE for reliability latency security and cost checks, and Q2 2027 for the target launch. NOWCURRENT BUILDENGINEER Q1 2027ALPHA VALIDATEGATE Q2 2027TARGET Architecture andintegration contracts Broker and parallelexecution Community alphatechnical demonstration Reliability, latency,security, cost Target launchreadiness dependent Define schemasPrototype one requestInvite feedbackTest failure modesOperational readiness
Current and build work Alpha and target milestone Validation gate

The diagram shows intended sequencing only. It does not represent completed engineering or a guaranteed release schedule.

02 — Current Stage

Architecture and early engineering

The current focus is to make the boundaries between a live conversation and supporting intelligence explicit enough to test.

CURRENT STAGE

Before a useful demonstration can be evaluated, the system needs clear contracts for what is requested, what counts as evidence, what actions are permitted, and how updates return to the voice agent.

Work at this stage is defining request, evidence, policy, and update schemas. These are proposed interfaces under development, not a published API or completed SDK.

Stage evidence

Illustrative schemas can be reviewed, versioned, and exercised with repeatable inputs before broader execution is attempted.

StatusUnder developmentArchitecture and Early Engineering
03 — Build Stage

From a request to incremental evidence

The build stage is a focused prototype, not a claim of production readiness.

01

Live Decision Broker

Classify an incoming request, establish a deadline, and route bounded work under an explicit control layer.

02

Parallel Specialist Execution

Coordinate supporting tasks that can investigate different parts of a question without creating several customer-facing voices.

03

Incremental Result Delivery

Return qualified evidence as it becomes available rather than waiting for every background task to finish.

Prototype objective: exercise one voice-agent request from intake through incremental results, with observable boundaries and honest failure handling.
04 — Community Alpha

Q1 2027: a narrow technical demonstration

The planned alpha is intended to expose the workflow to informed observers and collect developer feedback.

Q1 2027

Initial technical demonstration

The first demonstration is expected to show one voice-agent scenario, supporting intelligence tasks, incremental evidence delivery, and a policy-controlled recommendation.

Scope may change as engineering progresses. Community outreach will be subject to the rules of each relevant community.

  • Reproduce the scenarioUse a defined request and documented assumptions.
  • Observe the handoffsReview broker routing, task progress, evidence, and updates.
  • Gather developer feedbackIdentify integration challenges, usability issues, and reliability limits.
05 — Validation Gate

Test the system where real workflows break

Validation is a decision gate between an interesting demonstration and any wider operational claim.

VALIDATION

Planned checks cover latency, reliability, security, evidence quality, and cost efficiency. The work includes testing failure recovery and whether evidence remains understandable and appropriately qualified as partial results arrive.

No performance benchmark is presented here as a verified result. Measurements would need reproducible conditions and documented methodology.

  • LatencyUnderstand timing under bounded, observable conditions.
  • ReliabilityExercise timeouts, missing data, and recovery paths.
  • SecurityReview authorization boundaries and data handling assumptions.
  • Evidence qualityCheck provenance, freshness, uncertainty, and policy fit.
  • Cost efficiencyMake resource use visible before making scale claims.
06 — Target Launch

Q2 2027, subject to readiness

Target launch timing depends on successful engineering validation and operational readiness.

Q2 2027

Target, not guarantee

A launch target is useful only when the preceding evidence supports it. The project will not treat a calendar date as proof that the system is ready.

Readiness questions

Can the demonstration be reproduced, monitored, secured, explained, and operated with clear ownership? Those questions remain open until validation is complete.

07 — Milestone Discipline

Evidence before escalation

Milestones keep the project honest by defining what must be demonstrated before the next stage is described as ready.

Planning principle

Each gate requires reproducible evidence; dates are planning targets, not guaranteed release commitments.

Roadmap dates are planning targets and may change as technical validation progresses.

What is deliberately not promised

  • No guaranteed release day
  • No countdown
  • No fabricated completed stages
  • No invented performance benchmarks

Roadmap questions

Follow the work, not a countdown

Review the proposed architecture, understand the planned alpha, or contact the team with a technical question.